The United States extended a waiver on Russian oil sanctions until May 16, citing a need to calm energy markets roiled by conflict with Iran.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky strongly condemned the move, arguing it provides Russia with billions in revenue to fund its war effort in Ukraine.
The decision highlights a strategic dilemma for Washington, balancing support for Ukraine against the economic fallout from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Atlas AI
Kyiv sharply criticized a US decision to extend a sanctions waiver that permits purchases of Russian oil already loaded onto vessels, with the allowance running until May 16. Officials linked the move to an urgent effort to steady global energy markets that have been jolted by a new conflict affecting supply flows.
US officials said the waiver is intended “to ensure oil is available to those who need it” as diplomatic negotiations aimed at resolving the conflict reportedly accelerate. The extension comes amid a war involving the US, Israel, and Iran that has triggered severe disruptions across energy supply chains, adding to volatility in prices and availability.
US Sanctions Efficacy and Global Energy Market Stability
The US extension of a waiver allowing purchases of Russian oil, despite criticism from Ukraine, highlights the ongoing tension between geopolitical pressure on Russia and concerns over global energy market stability. This decision suggests that ensuring sufficient oil supply to prevent price shocks may currently take precedence over maximizing economic pressure on Russia through sanctions.
Officials cited Iran’s effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz as the central driver of the current energy crunch. The waterway is described as a critical chokepoint through which approximately 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) transits, a disruption that has fueled fears of a global recession.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky condemned the waiver extension, arguing it weakens pressure on Moscow and channels revenue toward Russia’s war effort. Speaking on Sunday, he said, “every dollar paid for Russian oil is money for the war,” and asserted that proceeds from oil sales are “directly converted into new strikes against Ukraine.”
Zelensky cited figures to support his argument, though the basis for them was not specified in the remarks. He said Russia operates a “shadow fleet” of more than 110 tankers holding over 12 million tons of oil, which he claimed could generate $10 billion for the Kremlin.
He also described the scale of recent attacks, saying that over the past week Russia launched more than 2,360 attack drones, more than 1,320 guided aerial bombs, and nearly 60 missiles against Ukrainian cities and communities. He pointed to what he called the deadliest assault in months on April 15, when Russia used over 700 drones and missiles in a single night, resulting in at least 18 deaths.
The waiver was first introduced on March 13 and has become a point of diplomatic friction between Washington and Kyiv. US officials have emphasized limiting economic fallout from the conflict with Iran, while Ukrainian officials view the waiver as undercutting the broader international sanctions campaign against Moscow.
On the battlefield, the war in Ukraine was described as largely stalemated, with Russian forces holding approximately 20% of Ukraine’s territory. The source also said Ukrainian forces have targeted Russian energy facilities in recent months in response to continued bombardment.
Diplomatically, US-led efforts to mediate an end to the war in Ukraine were reported to have been paused as attention shifted to de-escalating the crisis with Iran. With energy security and conflict diplomacy now intertwined, the near-term path toward a settlement in Ukraine was described as uncertain.


