The UK government is defending its £330 million contract with Palantir for the NHS Federated Data Platform amidst parliamentary concerns about intellectual property ownership and potential vendor lock-in, highlighting ongoing scrutiny of public sector tech deals.
Critics worry the contract structure grants intellectual property rights for connecting software to Palantir, not the NHS, potentially creating long-term dependency and limiting the NHS's control over its data infrastructure post-contract.
Despite concerns, the government emphasizes a rigorous procurement process and projected £777 million benefits, with a break clause in 2027 allowing for re-evaluation and potential provider changes, indicating a future decision point for the platform's direction.

Atlas AI
The UK government has defended its £330 million contract with Palantir for the National Health Service's Federated Data Platform (FDP). This defense follows parliamentary criticism regarding intellectual property ownership and potential vendor lock-in.
Reports indicate that the contract structure leaves intellectual property rights for connecting sosourcesware with the supplier, not the NHS. This arrangement raises concerns about long-term dependency and the absence of NHS-owned sosourcesware deliverables post-subscription.
Officials state the FDP is part of the Government Major Projects Portfolio and has received a 'green' rating from the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority. Projected benefits are estimated at £777 million, against whole-life costs of £1.042 billion.
The government asserts the contract was awarded through a rigorous, competitive procurement process, including a value-for-money assessment. An independent evaluation of the FDP's impact has also been commissioned.
Currently, 123 NHS hospital trusts are reportedly live on the FDP, with 80 reporting benefits. A break clause in the contract in spring 2027 will trigger an evaluation of the service and potential alternative providers.
