The European Commission is preparing rules to limit platform features it deems "addictive," with proposals to change defaults and consider higher minimum ages for accounts.
Enforcement is the central challenge: age verification is easily bypassed without technical standards, penalties and coordinated oversight across jurisdictions.
Experts and commentators urge pairing regulation with societal measures — school phone policies, investments in parks and safer routes — to address youth mental health more effectively.

Atlas AI
EU regulators are drafting social media regulation to limit endless scrolling, push notifications and raise the minimum account age for children.
New rules target design that encourages long use
The European Commission is preparing regulatory measures aimed at curbing features it describes as "addictive design," including endless scrolling and persistent push notifications.
Officials say the package would require platforms to alter default settings and offer stronger protections for minors. The proposals form part of a broader, decade-long effort by European institutions to restrict children’s exposure to social media.
Age limits and enforcement challenges
Among options under consideration is delaying the age at which children can open accounts, a move intended to reduce early exposure. The Commission has not published a final draft or a timeline for adoption.
Policy experts warn age limits can be difficult to enforce: children often bypass verification by misreporting birthdates or using adults’ devices. Critics say verification systems must be paired with robust enforcement tools to be effective.
Policy debate: law alone versus wider societal change
Some commentators argue that only very stringent measures—cited by proponents as comparable to Australia’s recent teen-focused restrictions—would have significant impact, though data on long-term mental health outcomes remains limited.
Others point to non-legislative interventions as essential complements. Jonathan Haidt, author of The Anxious Generation, has urged schools to ban phones during the day and .
Advocates for integrated approaches say combining regulation with changes in schools, urban planning and parental guidance is more likely to reduce harms than rules alone. They note that single-country initiatives face limitations given the global nature of platforms.
Legal specialists emphasize the need for clear compliance requirements, penalties for noncompliance and technical standards for age verification. Without these, companies may implement cosmetic changes that do not alter user experience materially.
European lawmakers will weigh stakeholder input as the Commission finalizes proposals; industry groups and child welfare organizations are expected to press contrasting views. The digital services regulatory landscape in Europe already includes the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act, which may influence enforcement design.
If adopted, the measures could reshape default settings across major platforms used by tens of millions of European minors. Observers say next steps include public consultations, impact assessments and a legislative timetable from Brussels.
What to watch: the specific technical requirements for interface changes, age-verification standards, and the balance between regulatory teeth and practicability. Those elements will determine whether the new rules change platform behavior or simply create new compliance checkboxes.
Implications include increased compliance costs for platforms, stronger privacy and safety protections for youth, and an intensifying policy debate over whether technology regulation must be paired with broader social reforms to address childhood mental health concerns.


